SCIENTIFIC TEXT EDITING UNDER SURVEILLANCE: MAJOR PUBLISHERS AND THE MONETIZATION OF AUTHORS' INFORMATION

Autores/as

  • Jefferson Pooley

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37543/oceanides.v38i1.288

Palabras clave:

TEXTOS CIENTÍFICOS

Resumen

The world's major academic publishers partially base their business model on the unpaid work of researchers and the sale of derivative products to universities and academic institutions. Thus, the reviewing and editing work of researchers translates into the sale of these products in the form of individual articles or subscriptions at exorbitant prices, often including charges for article processing (APC). This is a lucrative business that major publishers are reluctant to give up. However, another business, perhaps equally or even more profitable, has now been added to their publishing operations: the wealth behind authors' information or data on their behavior contained in the publications they own or control. Major publishers and associated corporations such as Clarivate, Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, SAGE, and others use so-called "predictive analysis" to process scientific production data to analyze the behavior of academics, which they later sell to their clients (and suppliers): the universities themselves. These publishers treat academics much like Google treats all its users: they gather data about their behavior, generating valuable information about their trends, habits, or preferences. Google monetizes this information with various companies that want to sell their products to a targeted audience. Similarly, publishers sell the collected information to universities and government offices involved in scientific policy decision-making. The new business of "predictive analysis" is based on the behavioral data generated by academics. In other words, researchers produce data with each participation in an article or peer-reviewed report. Some of this data is incorporated into the publishers' main products in the form of download counts and article recommendations. Academic publishing is its own emerging surveillance economy. We can describe a publisher as "surveillance-based" if it derives a substantial portion of its income from predictive analysis based on information extracted from researchers' behavior. As Dr. Sarah Lamdan of the City University of New York School of Law said, "Your journals are spying on you."

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Anónimo. (2020). Informa PLC Press Release. Informa.com. https://www.informa.com/globalassets/documents/investor-relations/2020/informa-adds-f1000-research.pdf

Anónimo. (2023 a). Reading scientific literature can also reveal privacy, Elsevier PDF reader collects

user information. Inf.news (s/f). https://inf.news/en/tech/ebd522a6fc3a471730373ba697f55ce6.html

Anónimo. (2023 b) Stop tracking science. (s/f). Stoptrackingscience.Eu. https://stoptrackingscience.eu/

Anónimo. (2023 c). Wikipedia contributors. Goodhart’s law. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Goodhart%27s_law&oldid=1132595374

Baykoucheva, S. (2019). Eugene Garfield’s ideas and legacy and their impact on the culture of research.

Publications, 7(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020043

Bouk, D. (2018). How our days became numbered: Risk and the rise of the statistical individual. University of Chicago Press.

Brembs, B. (2021). Massive over-payment of academic publishers has enabled them to buy surveillance technology covering the entire workflow that can be used not only to be combined with our private data and sold, but also to make algorithmic (a.k.a. “evidence-led”) employment decisions. Twitter. https://twitter.com/brembs/status/1440942564094402560?s=21

Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X

Brin, S., & Page, L. (2012). Reprint of: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks, 56(18), 3825–3833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.10.007

Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

Büttcher, S., Clarke, C. L. A., & Cormack, G. V. (2016). Information retrieval: Implementing and evaluating search engines. MIT Press.

Chan, L. (2019). Platorm Capitalism and the Governance of Knowledge Infrastructure. Digital Initiative Symposium 2019, April 29-30, University of San Diego, CA

Cramer-Flood, E. (2021). “Duopoly Still Rules the Global Digital Ad Market, but Alibaba and Amazon Are on the Prowl.” eMarketer, May 10, 2021. https://www.emarketer.com/content/duopolys- till-rules-global-digital-ad-market-alibaba-ama- zon-on-prowl.

Cuéllar, M. F., & Huq, A. Z. (2010). Economies of Surveillance. Book Review. Harvard Law Review, 133, 1280–1336.

de Knecht, S. (2020). Dutch open science deal primarily benefits Elsevier. ScienceGuide. https://www.scienceguide.nl/2020/06/open-science-deal-benefits-elsevier/DFG-Committee (2021). Data tracking in research: aggregation and use or sale of usage data by academic publishers. A briefing paper of the Committee on Scientific Library Services and Information Systems of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5937995

Elsevier. (2005). A Short History of Elsevier. London: Reed Elsevier. http://www.ask-force.org/web/Seralini/Elsevier-Short-History-2005.pdf.

Elsevier. (2022). Discover research: Wiley, ACS,

RSC, Taylor & Francis, Elsevier. (s/f). Sciencedi- rect.com. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org

Elsevier. (n.f. a). “Elsevier Fingerprint Engine.” Accessed November 16, 2021. https://www.elsevier.

com/solutions/elsevier-fingerprint-engine.

Elsevier. (n.f. b). “[Pure] Features.” Accessed No- vember 16, 2021. https://www.elsevier.com/solu- tions/pure/features.

Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and

reactivity: How public measures recreate social

worlds. American journal of sociology, 113(1),

–40. https://doi.org/10.1086/517897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/517897

Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008). A socio- logy of quantification. Archives Europeennes de

Sociologie. European Journal of Sociology. Europaisches Archiv Für Soziologie, 49(3), 401–436.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975609000150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609000150

Fourcade, M., & Johns, F. (2020). Loops, ladders and

links: the recursivity of social and machine lear- ning. Theory and Society, 49(5–6), 803–832. ht- tps://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09409-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09409-x

Fund, S. (2021). Wiley acquires open access innovator knowledge unlatched. Knowledge Unlatched, A Wiley Brand, Wiley-VCH GmbH – A

Company of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://

openresearch.community/posts/wiley-acquires-open-access-innovator-knowledge-unlatched

Garfield, E. (2006). Commentary: Fifty years of citation indexing. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(5), 1127–1128. https://doi.org/10.1093/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl190

ije/dyl190

Gillespie, T. (2017). Algorithmically recogniza- ble: Santorum’s Google problem, and Google’s DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1199721

Santorum problem. Information, Communica- tion and Society, 20(1), 63–80. https://doi.or- g/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1199721

Hill, P. (2021). Coursera, 2U, and the emerging education platform market. PhilOnEdTech. https://

philonedtech.com/coursera-2u-and-the-emerging-education-platform-market/

Hunter, S. (2016). Wiley signs definitive agreement

to acquire atypon. Atypon: Online Publishing

Platform & Web Development Tools; Atypon

Systems, LLC. https://www.atypon.com/news/

wiley-signs-definitive-agreement-to-acqui- re-atypon/

Informa Group. (2021). Depth & Data: Informa

Group Annual Report and Accounts 2020. Lon- don: Informa Group.

Lamdan, S. (2021). Your journals are spying on you:

Research surveillance in library products. https://

scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/26873

La Monica, P. R. (2004). “Google Jumps 18% in Debut.” CNN Money, August 19, 2004. https://money.cnn.com/2004/08/19/technology/goog/

Lauer, J. (2017). Creditworthy: A history of consumer DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/laue16808

surveillance and financial identity in America.

Columbia University Press.

McKenzie, L. (2018). Wiley makes a play to lead

OPM space, and signals change ahead. Insidehighered.com. https://www.insidehighered.com/

digital-learning/article/2018/10/10/wiley-makesplay-lead-opm-space-and-signals-change-ahead

Murakami-Wood, D. (2009). Spies in the informa- tion economy: academic publishers and the

trade in personal information. ACME, 8(3),

–493. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:-

de:0168-ssoar-200719

Pooley, J. (2021). Knowledge unlatched strikes again

and again. Jeffpooley.com. https://www.jeffpooley.com/2021/01/knowledge-unlatched-strikes-again-and-again/

Porter, T. M. (2020). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691208411.001.0001

objectivity in science and public life. Princeton

University Press.

Posada, A., & Chen, G. (2017). Publishers increa- singly in control of scholarly infrastructure and

this is why we should care. The knowledge Gap.

http://knowledgegap.org/index.php/sub-projects/

rent-seeking-and-financialization-of-the-acade- mic-publishing-industry/preliminary-findings/

Posada, A., & Chen, G. (2018). Inequality in knowle- dge production: The integration of academic in- frastructure by big publishers. 22nd International DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.30

Conference on Electronic Publishing.

Price, D. J. de S. (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers: The pattern of bibliographic references indicates the nature of the scientific research front.

Science (New York, N.Y.), 149(3683), 510–515.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3683.510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3683.510

RELX Group. (2016). Annual Report and Financial

Statements 2015. London: RELX Group.

Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549

Society, 6(1), 205395171882054. https://doi.

org/10.1177/2053951718820549

Shockey, N. (2021). Addressing the alarming systems of surveillance built by library vendors.

SPARC. https://sparcopen.org/news/2021/addressing-the-alarming-systems-of-surveillance-built-by-library-vendors/

Zijlstra, J. (1994). The University Licensing Program DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/0702169

(TULIP): A Large Scale Experiment in Bringing

Electronic Journals to the Desktop. Serials, 7(2),

–172.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New

Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

Wouters, P. (2017). Eugene Garfield (1925- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/543492a

. Nature, 543(7646), 492. https://doi.org/10.1038

Descargas

Publicado

2023-09-29

Cómo citar

Pooley, J. (2023). SCIENTIFIC TEXT EDITING UNDER SURVEILLANCE: MAJOR PUBLISHERS AND THE MONETIZATION OF AUTHORS’ INFORMATION. CICIMAR Oceánides, 38(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.37543/oceanides.v38i1.288

Número

Sección

Artículos