A review on the evaluation research of protected marine areas in Mexico

Authors

  • M. G. Rivera
  • P. Del Monte-Luna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37543/oceanides.v26i2.99

Keywords:

Evaluation Research, Program Evaluation, MPA, Management Effectiveness

Abstract

Evaluation Research (ER) has its origins in the XVII century but emerges as a formal discipline in 1970. ER consists on the application of techniques used in social sciences to evaluate specific human activities. The ER design may be experimental, quasi experimental or non-experimental and must contain at least 10 basic points where the planning and evaluation are particularly important. In Mexico there have been efforts to evaluate the programs of social development since 1917. Currently, this task is performed by the National Council for Social Policy Evaluation and the assessment of all social programs is compulsory. Regarding to the administration of natural resources, ER is essential; however, papers published on the subject are scarce. In order to improve the management of the Marine Protected Areas (MPA) and to assess the level on which the goals and objectives has been reached (Adaptive Management) the ER is applied to evaluate the implementation of MPAs using different methodologies. In Mexico, the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas is in charge
of the evaluation of the MPAs; however, the methods used have proven little effective and lack of technical capacity. In the MPAs to do such assessments it is necessary to reinforce the evaluation capacity within the administration of MPA supported by civil organizations and academy. Proper assessment of MPAs in Mexico will allow the practice of a true adaptive management, to meet the implementation objectives and, above all, a clear accountability to the society on the effectiveness of MPA as a tool to manage natural resources. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allesina, S. & M. Pascual. 2008. Network structure, predator-prey modules, and stability in large food webs. Theor. Ecol., 1: 55-64.

Behrman, J. R. & E. Skoufias. 2006. Mitigating Myths about Policy Effectiveness: Evaluation of Mexico's Antipoverty and Human Resource Investment Program. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. S.S., 606: 244 -275.

Bermejo-Jiménez, J. E. 2007. Las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil en México. Bien Común, 151:25-28.

Campbell, D. E., B. N. Steenbarger, T.W. Smith & R. J. Stucky. 1982. An Ecological Systems Approach to Evaluation. Evaluation Rev., 6: 625-648.

Cardozo, B. M. 2003. Evaluación de Políticas de Desarrollo Social. Política y Cultura, 20:139-154.

Cardozo, B. M. 2006. La evaluación de políticas y programas de desarrollo social en México: Cámara de Diputados-Porrúa, México. 374 p.

Congreso de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. 1988. Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 28 de enero de 1988.

Ferraro, P. J. 2009. Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. New Directions for Evaluation, 122: 75-84.

Feick, J. L. 2000. Evaluating ecosystem management in the Columbia Mountains of British Columbia. Tesis de doctorado. University of Calgary. Canadá, 463 p.

Feinsten, O. & G. Hernàndez . 2008. El papel de la evaluación en México: Logros desafíos y oportunidades. México. La calidad del gasto público. Nota # 2. 1-4.

FMCN, 2010. Fondo para Áreas Naturales Protegidas. Manual de operaciones 2010. Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza A.C. http://www.fmcn.org/ 222 p.

Gubbay, S. (Ed.). 1995. Marine Protected Areas. Principles and techniques for management. Chapman & Hall. Londres, 232 p.

Hockings, M., S. Stolton, F. Leverington, N. Dudley & J. Courrau. 2006. Evaluating effectiveness. A framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. 2da edición. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Xiv + 105 p.

Hough, J. L. 1998. Financing marine protected areas: the role of the GEF. PARKS 8: 53-49.

Kelleher, G. 1999. Guidelines for Marine Protected Areas. En: Phillips, A. (Ed.) Best Practice Protected Area. Guidelines Series No. 3. IUCN, xxiv + 107 p.

Leverington, F., M. Hockings, H. Pavese, K. Lemos-Costa & J. Courrau. 2008a. Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas -A global study. Overview of approaches and methodologies. The University of Queensland, Gatton, TNC, WWF, IUCN-WCPA, 188 p.

Leverington, F., M. Hockings, & K. LemosCosta. 2008b. Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas. University of Queensland, Gatton, IUCN, WCPA, TNC, WWF, 70 p.

Muthiga, N. A. 2009. Evaluating the effectiveness of management of the Malindi -Watamu marine protected area complex in Kenya. - Ocean Coast. Manage., 52: 417- 423.

Nagel, S.S. 1986. Microcomputers and Evaluation Research [Número especial]. Evaluation Rev., 10(5): 563-577.

Pomeroy, R. S., J. E. Parks & L.M. Watson. 2006. Cómo evaluar una AMP. Manual de Indicadores Naturales y Sociales para Evaluar la Efectividad de la Gestión de Áreas Marinas Protegidas. UICN, Gland, Suiza y Cambridge, Reino Unido, p. xvi + 216.

Rossi, P. H., M.W. Lipsey & H. E. Freeman. 2004. Evaluation -A Systematic Approach. Sage Pub, USA, 470 p.

Rutman, L. 1977. Evaluation Research Methods: A Basic Guide. Sage Public, USA, 249 p.

Salm, R. V., J. Clark & E. Sirila. 2000. Marine and oastal Protected Areas: A guide for planners and managers. UICN, xxi + 371 p.

Weiss, C. H. 1972. Evaluation research: methods for assessing program effectiveness. Prentice-Hall, USA. 160 p.

Published

2011-12-04

How to Cite

Rivera, M. G., & Del Monte-Luna, P. (2011). A review on the evaluation research of protected marine areas in Mexico. CICIMAR Oceánides, 26(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.37543/oceanides.v26i2.99

Issue

Section

Articles