Applications of the Path dependence theory: common fisheries policy (EU) and the fisheries policies in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37543/oceanides.v32i2.209Keywords:
path dependence, fisheries policy, European Union, Mexico, Institutions and fisheriesAbstract
The concept of path dependence is used in social sciences to understand economic systems. From this concept its analytical application is addressed to fisheries policy in two different contexts such as the European Union and Mexico. The European Commission is beginning to address the producer´s views on consequences and impacts resulting from adjustments; buyback fleet programs; fishing rights and access conditions, or social and economic impact on fishing regions. Meanwhile in the case of Mexico, the settlement process and emphasis of fisheries policy in its regulations and administrative programs are identified with social demands, and since the 80´s and 90´s the economic efficiency elements take more of an increasingly role, and a recent aspect of sustainability tries to be incorporated into the fisheries and aquaculture policies.
Downloads
References
Castro, S. & J. Correia da Silva. 2005. Past expectations as a determinant of present prices hysteresis in a simple economy. FEP. Working Paper, nº 85. Universidade de Porto.
Charles, A. 1992. Fishery conflicts: a midfield framework. Marine Policy 16(5): 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(92)90006-B
Charles, A. 2002. Use rights and responsible fisheries: limiting acces and harvesting trough rights-based management. 253-281, En: Cockrane, K. (ed.) A fishery manager's guidebook. Management measures and their application. FAO Fish Tech Paper. no 424. Roma.
CPEUM. 2000. Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Ed. Porrúa, S.A. México, 2000. 132 p.
David, P.A. 1998. Path dependence, its critics and the quest for historical. Oxford Stanford University (Working Paper). Diario Oficial de la Federación. 1994. Decreto de Formación de la Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca. Diario Oficial de la Federación. México. 28 de diciembre de 1994.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. 1999. Reglamento de la Ley de Pesca. 28 de septiembre de 1999. Diario Oficial de la Federación. México. Segunda Sección. 32 p.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2001. Decreto por el que se crea la Comisión Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 31 de mayo de 2001.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2010. Acuerdo mediante el cual se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 2 de diciembre de 2010.
Dosi, G. & Nelson, R.R. 1994. An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Evolucionary Economics. 4: 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236366
FAO. 1995. Código de Conducta para la Pesca Responsable. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación. Roma, Italia. FAO. 1995. 47 p. https://doi.org/10.18356/7fed518c-es
Finkbeiner E. M. & X. Basurto. 2015. Re-defining co-management to facilitate small-scale fisheries reform: An illustration from northwest Mexico. Marine Policy, 51: 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.010
Froese, R. & A. Proelbs. 2010. Rebuilding fish stocks no later than 2015: will Europe meet the deadline? Fish & Fisheries, 11: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2009.00349.x
Gaceta Parlamentaria. 1998. Del Congreso del Estado de Baja California Sur, que adiciona la Fracción XVII Bis y reforma el punto 2 de la fracción XXIX del artículo 73 de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. En: Gaceta Parlamentaria Año I. No.109.Palacio Legislativo de San Lázaro, 03/Septiembre/1998.
González-Laxe, F. 2010. Disfunctions in common fishing regulations. Marine Policy, 34: 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.06.003
Greener, I. 2005. The potential of path dependence in political studies. Politics, 25(1): 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2005.00230.x
Iniciativa de Ley de Pesca. 1992. 1-603, En: González Oropeza, M. & M.A. Garita Alonso (Coords.). El Régimen Jurídico de la Pesca en México. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas. Serie G: Estudios doctrinales, No. 150. SEPESCA / UNAM.
Khalilian, S., R. Froese, A. Proelbs & T. Requete. 2010. Designed for failure. A critique of the Common Fishery Policy of the European Union. Marine Policy, 34: 1178-1182.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.04.001
Le Floc'h Pascal, F., Daur'es, O. Guyader & J. Wilson. 2012. A Case Study of Technological Switching and Technological Lock-In in the French Fisheries Sector: Why is Sustainable Change so Difficult? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60: 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2012.01259.x
Lequesne, C. 2001. L'Europe Bleue. A quoi sert tune politique communautaire de la pêche. Presses de Science Po. Paris.
https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.leque.2001.01
Ley de Pesca. 1992 (comentada). Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas. Serie A: Fuentes; b) Textos y estudios legislativos, No. 89. SEPESCA / UNAM. México, 1993. 103 p.
Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente. 1997. Delitos Ambientales. Procuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente. Enero de 1997. 244 p.
Magnunson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation Act. 1996. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/magact/
Mahoney, J. 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29: 507-548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
Mahoney, J. 2001. Path dependence explanations of regimen change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1): 111-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687587
North, D. 1994. Economic Performance Through Time. American Economic Review, 84 (3): 359- 68.
Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence and study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94 (2): 251-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
Pierson, P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton University Press. Princeton. Reglamento Interior de la Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca. 1997. SEMARNAP. 152 p.
Seijo J.C., O. Defeo & S. Salas. 1997. Bioeconomía Pesquera. Teoría, modelación y manejo. Documento Técnico de Pesca No. 368. FAO. Roma, Italia. 176 p.
Soberanes-Fernández, J. L. 1994. Historia Contemporánea de la Legislación Pesquera en México. 1-603, En: González Oropeza, M. & M.A. Garita Alonso (Coords.), El Régimen Jurídico de la Pesca en México. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas. Serie G: Estudios doctrinales, No. 150. SEPESCA / UNAM.
Villasante, S., M.C. García-Negro, F. González-Laxe, G. Rodriguez. 2011. Overfishing and the CFP: sucessfull resultats from TAC regulation? Fish & Fisheries, 12(1): 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00373.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Germán Ponce -Díaz, Fernando González -Laxe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
